“Dwight D. EisenhowersForeignPolicy
Eisenhower after gaining the U.S. presidency introduced changes to the existing policies regarding national security. The policies are referred to as the New Look. The primary components of this policy were: Nuclear technology Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) the U.S. economy and its allies. Relative to nuclear technology the policy targeted to enhance nuclear technology to counteract communist aggression. In regards to the CIA the policy empowered CIA ding the spying mission of nations or leaders allied to embracing communism (Paterson 277). On the U.S. economy the policy aimed to protect the economy from the adverse effect of the Cold War. The policy targeted strengthening its relationship with its allies as well as winning the nonaligned governments to their side.
Eisenhower New Look strategy surpassed Kennans and NSC 68 strategies. Kennans containment policy purposed to disintegrate the communist bloc and reform Soviet nature towards international relations. On the other hand the NSC 68 strategies emphasized on strengthening the defense perimeter to countries under threat of Soviet aggression. These strategies incorporated a feature of flexibility in response. To Kennan action was initiated if the states interest were at stake; and if the conditions and means were favorable and accessible respectively. For NSC 68 action was taken whenever there was communist aggression. With respect to Eisenhowers strategy the U S would act at any time and place based on its choice (massive retaliation). The stronghold of this policy over others was long term preparedness in terms of response. In addition this policy ensured that there was budget balance unlike the others policies. The Eisenhowers New Look policy had numerous accomplishments. Eisenhowerinfluenced and contributed to ending of the Korean War. Next he stabilized the rivalry between America and the Soviet Union. Furthermore he strengthened the international relation with European allies.
However Eisenhowers New Look strategy was faced with much criticism by scholars. The majority of the critics are against the involvement of nuclear technology and CIA surveillance. Gaddis elaborates that Eisenhowers policy had more harm than benefits. First of all the excessive reliance on nuclear technology as the main element of deterrence was futile (Tannenwald 142). This was attributed to the fact that considerable considerations were ignored. Its impact on manipulating the communist rifts was not considered. They undermined the Soviet Union balance in allowing development of missiles. On the contrary this triggered the Soviets to intensify their nuclear building programs. Secondly the policy failed to stop revolutions amongst the third world. Gaddis alludes that the policy mainly concentrated on opposing communism in the developing third world. In its attempts it failed to consider the Third World nationalism leading to the rise of nationalist movements allied to communism like in Vietnam.
Eisenhowers tenure in office aroused many reactions. He was broadly categorized as being inactive and uninspiring; thereby his reputation had immensely declined. During his farewell address he issued a warning relating to military and industrial complex. Eisenhower called the Americans to rise against the influence on its democracy thinking and internal interests regarding to military power and expenditure (militarization). In this respect national liberty and economy would be at risk if these issues were ignored. According to Michael Sherry Eisenhower efforts towards militarization were a total failure. This was attributed to his strategy of expanding nuclear technology to deter communist influence. The Soviet Union by that time was seeking world dominion in the Cold War like the U.S. hence reacted to the threats posed by the introduction of nuclear weapons.”

  

Click Order Now to get 100% Original Answer Customized to your instructions!